Safety of colchicine or NSAID prophylaxis when initiating allopurinol for gout: propensity score-matched cohort studies

Talk Code: 
3B.1
Presenter: 
Richard Partington
Co-authors: 
Edward Roddy, Ram Bajpai, Harry Forrester, Richard Partington, Christian Mallen, Lorna Clarson, Nishita Padmanabhan, Rebecca Whittle, Sara Muller
Author institutions: 
Keele University School of Medicine

Problem

Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis. Urate lowering therapy, most commonly prescribed in primary care, is used in the treatment of gout to lower serum urate levels and reduce the frequency of flares. initiating urate-lowering therapy for gout commonly triggers a gout flare and hence co-prescription of colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prophylaxis is recommended. However, little is known about the incidence of adverse events associated with prophylaxis. We aimed to determine the risk of adverse events severe enough to warrant seeking healthcare associated with colchicine or NSAID prophylaxis when initiating allopurinol for gout.

Approach

We conducted two matched retrospective cohort studies, using linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) datasets. Adults aged ≥18 years with a Read code for gout and a new allopurinol prescription between 1997 and 2016 were identified. We compared those prescribed (1) colchicine or (2) NSAID prophylaxis with those prescribed no prophylaxis, individually matched by age, sex and propensity to receive prophylaxis, to reduce the impact of confounding by indication. Adverse events were identified in CPRD and HES using Read and ICD10 codes respectively. Associations between colchicine or NSAID prophylaxis and the first occurrence of each outcome were investigated using mixed effects Cox proportional hazards models. CPRD Gold and Aurum datasets were analysed separately and then combined using inverse variance fixed-effects two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis.

Findings

13,945 individuals who initiated allopurinol with colchicine prophylaxis were matched to 13,945 who initiated without prophylaxis (mean age 63.62 years (95%CI 63.54, 63.70); 78% male). Diarrhoea was the most common adverse event in the colchicine group, followed by nausea/vomiting, myocardial infarction (MI), neuropathy, myalgia, and bone marrow suppression. Diarrhoea (Hazard Ratio 2.22 (95% CI 1.83, 2.69)), MI (1.55 (1.10, 2.17)), neuropathy (4.75 (1.20, 18.76)), myalgia (2.64 (1.45, 4.81)), and bone marrow suppression (3.29 (1.43, 7.58)) were significantly more common with colchicine prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis.22,880 individuals who initiated allopurinol with NSAID prophylaxis were matched to 22,880 who initiated without prophylaxis (mean age 63.34 years (95%CI 63.26, 63.42); 78% male). Angina (Hazard Ratio 1.62 (95% CI 1.38, 1.90)), acute kidney injury (1.49 (1.14, 1.96)), MI (1.82 (1.37, 2.43)), and peptic ulcer disease (2.03 (1.34, 3.07)) were significantly more common with NSAID prophylaxis than without.

Consequences

Gastrointestinal, cardiorenal, myoneuropathic and haematological adverse events were associated with prophylaxis, although absolute event rates were low. This information can inform treatment decisions and choice of colchicine or NSAID for prophylaxis when initiating allopurinol.

Submitted by: 
Richard Partington
Funding acknowledgement: 
This abstract presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit programme (Grant Reference Number: NIHR 200490). CDM, RB and SM are part-funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands (ARC WM). CDM is also funded by the NIHR School for Primary Care Research and a NIHR Research Professorship in General Practice (NIHR-RP-2014-04-026). NP is an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.